In hospitality, there’s a conversation that keeps repeating.

It starts with music. But quickly slides into: tariffs, licenses, inspections, fines.

And when all that gets “sorted,” a sense of relief appears.

“Now we’re covered.”

The problem is everyone else is covered too.

Legality is a floor, not a ceiling

Music licensing systems—PROs, collecting societies, local regulators—set a minimum threshold.

That threshold applies to everyone. Nobody wins on it.

Compliance doesn’t distinguish a good hotel from a great one. A premium restaurant from an average one. A strong brand from a generic one.

It just removes risk.

Why compliance feels like a “solved problem”

Compliance has:

  • A clear end. There’s a moment when it’s done.
  • Confirmation. A document that proves it.
  • Binary logic. You either are or you aren’t.

Experience has no such simplicity.

That’s why organizations instinctively focus on what they can “close”—and neglect what must be continuously managed.

How compliance mindset blocks growth

When music and atmosphere get reduced to “what matters is that it’s legal,” several things happen:

  • Nobody thinks about rhythm. Is there a daily arc of experience? Nobody asks.
  • Nobody designs transitions. Zones shift abruptly, without intention.
  • Nobody takes ownership. Atmosphere is “everyone’s,” which means—nobody’s.
  • Improvisation becomes the norm. Every shift runs on gut feeling.

Atmosphere exists—but isn’t managed.

International markets: everyone shares the same framework

This is what makes the global context specific.

If everyone follows the law, has the same licenses, operates “by the rules”—the only thing left for differentiation is: how the space behaves in real time.

And that’s an operational category, not a legal one.

Aspect Compliance (legal music) Atmosphere Strategy
Focus Avoiding risk Creating value
Goal Minimum standard Differentiation
Approach Reactive Proactive
Management Binary (yes/no) Continuous
Result Everyone equal Competitive advantage
Ownership Legal/compliance team Operations/experience

Compliance removes risk, strategy creates value

Why compliance shouldn’t own atmosphere

Compliance teams are designed for minimizing risk, following rules, avoiding penalties.

Atmosphere requires: design, rhythm, adaptation, ownership.

When compliance takes over atmosphere, it gets reduced to “what we can’t do.”

But strategy never starts with that question.

Licensing regulations determine what you can play, who holds rights, what obligations you have.

Regulations don’t govern:

  • Space rhythm
  • Transitions through the day
  • The emotional arc of experience
  • Alignment of sound with operations

Put differently—legal music can be completely wrong music. And very often is.

What happens when you stop at compliance

When music gets reduced to “legal”:

  • Nobody thinks about the daily arc
  • Zones don’t differ meaningfully
  • Transitions happen randomly
  • Staff improvises

Atmosphere exists, but doesn’t work for the space.

This shows up in: inconsistent experience, weaker emotional connection, harder justification of price.

The reality: complexity without unified experience

International operators live in a reality where:

  • Each territory has its own licensing system
  • Rules differ by country
  • Documentation is complex
  • Legal risk is real

But the guest doesn’t know who your local PRO is. Doesn’t care about the regulator. Doesn’t feel compliance.

The guest feels consistency or its absence.

Why operators often stay with local solutions

Due to fragmentation, many organizations:

  • Solve music location by location
  • Delegate decisions to local teams
  • Allow major variations

Short-term, this reduces complexity and eases local management.

Long-term—it breaks brand experience at the group level. And makes scaling impossible.

System doesn’t mean uniformity

One common misconception: “If we have a system, everything must be the same.”

Systematic management doesn’t mean uniformity. It means controlled variation.

Operators who succeed:

  • Define shared principles
  • Allow local adaptation
  • Protect key experience elements

That’s the difference between rigid centralization and an intelligent system.

What a mature approach looks like

A mature system has four layers:

Four Layers of a Mature System

1. Legal Foundation

Compliance sorted, stable, stress-free. All licenses in place, documentation in order, risk eliminated.

2. Operational Framework

Clear rhythms, zones, and transitions. Daily experience arc defined, transitions intentional, not random.

3. Governance

Who decides, who protects, who escalates. Clear atmosphere ownership with mandate and authority.

4. Local Flexibility

Adaptation without breaking the brand. Controlled variation that respects local specifics.

Without all four layers, the system doesn’t hold.

The most common mistake: mixing layers

Problems arise when:

  • Compliance takes over operational decisions
  • Local teams change principles
  • Tools get used without a shared framework

Then atmosphere fragments, becomes unpredictable, depends on people—not the system.

And complexity becomes an excuse, not a challenge.

Where strategy actually begins

Strategy begins when you ask:

  • How should guests feel at different moments?
  • How should the space “breathe” through the day?
  • How should transitions unfold?
  • Who protects consistency?

Compliance is a prerequisite. Strategy is the answer to: what’s next?

The key question for decision makers

Don’t ask: “Are we covered?”

Ask: “Would our space be just as good if all competitors were fully legal?”

If the answer is “I don’t know”—strategy hasn’t started yet.

Or put differently: Don’t ask “Which solution is legal in each country?” Ask: “Which part of the experience must be stable in every country?”

That question separates law from strategy—and creates room for scaling.

Compliance is necessary

In hospitality, everyone shares the same legal framework. Everyone has the same obligations.

What separates winners from average isn’t legality.

It’s the ability to manage atmosphere as a system.

  • Minimum doesn’t create value
  • Safety doesn’t create emotion
  • Law doesn’t create differentiation

Resources